Leucosticte wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2019 12:25 am
I suggest breaking up some of those big paragraphs to improve readability.
My books are the most "readable" books that will ever be written. What you are trying to say is that you want the complexity of the book to be reduced so that it'll be more readable to
you. But of course I am not gonna do that. It is the complexity of the thought that determines the complexity of the paragraph, and not the other way around, as you would have it. A paragraph is supposed to be a complete thought, so of course it'd make no sense to cut up paragraphs into small pieces just because morons on the internet dislike "big paragraphs". If I actually just went in there and arbitrarily cut up paragraphs every few sentences the book would read like shit. Even a complete and utter doofus like you would see it if I just went in there and pressed enter every five lines. If you ever try to read a proper book by a proper author you will see that they have huge paragraphs; Proust has paragraphs that run for PAGES. BUT... according to you, Proust needs your help "to improve readability" lol. That's why contemporary journalism prints entire articles where EVERY SENTENCE IS A PARAGRAPH. Writing (and therefore thinking) don't get any lower than this.
Leucosticte wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2019 12:25 am
I also suggest marketing this to some NRx outlets (Unz Review, Taki's Magazine, Jim's Blog, etc.) once it's ready. You'd probably get a better reception there than in the PUA-sphere.
I sent an article to Taki and he rejected it. It was called "How Epstein Raped Himself", and in it I explain that Epstein, and the other liberals in hot water like Woody Allen, Louis C.K. et al. have been rabidly promoting liberalism for decades, so in a sense they raped themselves and are almost fully responsible for everything that befell them. And Taki declined to run it.
Jim is now placing all my comments in his moderation queue and deleting many of them, so I stopped posting there.
I have no idea what Unz is. I'll check it out, but I don't doubt I'd be banned from there too eventually, just like I have been from everywhere in the PUAsphere. You see, you recommend "NRx" outlets to me because you think they'll like my PUA-bashing, and this is true. But I am only bashing PUAs in order to deliver a higher, more effective PUA theory, not because I have a problem with PUA
per se, as the NRx outlets have. Moreover, in my philosophical work I shit on NRx outlets just as much as I do here on PUAs, so they hate me there too, just like they hate me in art theory and videogame circles. No one likes to be shat on, I am afraid, and that's why I made all these sites—because no site would host my work—and my writings will be largely confined to them for quite some time to come.